After Sessions 5–6 · 55–70 minutes
Session 5 conceptual questions 1, 3 and 4; Session 6 conceptual question 3 and the applied adoption-grid exercise. Add the Week 5 R contrast and a five-minute interpretation check.
Each session combines conceptual reasoning, empirical design, and a short base-R exercise. The topic numbers below follow the course programme. Use the combined teaching decks and the linked homework and R starters for each topic.
Which slides should I use? Sessions 2–3 have a continuation deck, building on the selection and matching background linked under Session 2. Sessions 5–6 share one teaching deck, and Sessions 7–8 share another. Revised topic-specific decks for Sessions 5–8 are available as reference material.
Question: Which statistical ideas help us read an empirical evaluation?
Concepts: distributions, expectations, conditional means, regression, sampling uncertainty, identification and independence.
Recommended reading:
Question: What exactly are we trying to learn when evaluating a policy?
Concepts: causal question, treatment, outcome, population, time horizon, potential outcomes, estimand, selection bias, internal and external validity.
Recommended paper:
Question: Can conditioning on observables reconstruct the missing counterfactual?
Concepts: naive comparisons, conditional independence, bad controls, propensity score, common support, balance diagnostics, clustered inference.
Recommended paper:
Question: What does randomisation solve, and what problems remain?
Concepts: assignment mechanism, balance, implementation threats, minimum detectable effect, cluster design effect, experimental protocol.
Recommended paper:
Question: Can exogenous variation in treatment identify effects when treatment is endogenous?
Concepts: encouragement design, compliers, always-takers, never-takers, defiers, relevance, independence, exclusion, monotonicity, weak instruments, external validity.
Recommended paper:
Question: Can untreated trends reveal the missing counterfactual trend?
Concepts: before-after comparison, treated-control comparison, ATT in the post period, parallel trends, TWFE, serial correlation, clustering.
Recommended paper:
Question: What changes when treatment timing and treatment effects are heterogeneous?
Concepts: omitted period, dynamic effects, anticipation, weak support, never-treated and not-yet-treated controls, ATT(g,t), aggregation.
Methodological readings:
Question: Can an institutional threshold create a locally credible comparison?
Concepts: running variable, cutoff, bandwidth, local linear regression, density checks, covariate continuity, placebo cutoffs, fuzzy RDD, local IV estimand.
Empirical applications:
Question: How do we synthesise, interpret, and challenge causal evidence?
Concepts: donor pool, predictors, weights, pre-treatment fit, treatment gap, placebo tests, heterogeneity, transport, robustness, replication audit.
Recommended paper:
Replication case: McCrary’s comment (2002) and Levitt’s reply (2002) on electoral-cycle instruments, police hiring and crime.
Use one selected route after each combined class, rather than automatically completing two full homework sheets. Full sheets remain available for revision.
Session 5 conceptual questions 1, 3 and 4; Session 6 conceptual question 3 and the applied adoption-grid exercise. Add the Week 5 R contrast and a five-minute interpretation check.
Session 7 conceptual questions 1, 3 and 5 and its applied threshold exercise; optional Session 8 conceptual question 2. Add the Week 7 R bandwidth and fuzzy-RDD calculations. The full Session 8 assignment remains optional.